Essay for you

The Ethics Of Eating Meat Singer And Mason Essay

Rating: 4.8/5.0 (30 Votes)

Category: Essay

Description

The Ethics of Eating Meat Essay - Animal Rights

The Ethics of Eating Meat Essay

Meat has been a staple food in the diet of mankind since the early ages of civilization. In the article “Is Any Meat Good to Eat?” by Sarah Boesveld, she interviews author Jonathan Safran to share his opinion on eating meat and factory farming. He believes that “. if [people] just ate according to the values they already have, then factory farming would disappear.” Whether or not people realize the sources from which meat in modern day society comes from, they cannot deny the fact that meat is delectable. Sadly, many people who are aware of where their meat comes from will argue that it is unethical to eat meat that is grown purely to satisfy the hunger of people. The ethics of eating meat should not be considered because of the extreme importance of meat in our diet.

People assume that eating factory farmed animals or wild animals are unethical, because humans are capable of thinking morally and making decisions based on that. One may argue that if animals can eat other animals, then it is acceptable for humans to eat other humans. This idea is not true. In nature, the animals.

Click the button above to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper

Click the button above to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper

Essay on Analyzing Ethics in Fore´s Eating Animals - Jonathan Safran Foer has entertained enormous significant approval and international awareness for his writing approach in novels for example Everything Is Illuminated: a Novel. The most recent book, however, is a factual and on edge. Eating Animals is a comprehensive Foer’s individual description of disagreements with the principles of eating animals subsequent to the delivery of his son. The book is sectioned into eight chapters, each one containing a title that is not completely obvious but more reminiscent and figurative. [tags: vegetarianism, Jonathan Safran Foer, ethics]

1152 words
(3.3 pages)

Counseling Ethics Essay - META-ETHICS: Meta-ethics is the branch of ethics that seeks to understand the nature of ethical properties, and ethical statements, attitudes, and judgments. Meta-ethics as a discipline gained attention with G.E. Moore's famous work Principia Ethica from 1903 in which Moore first addressed what he referred to as the naturalistic fallacy. Moore's rebuttal of naturalistic ethics, his Open Question Argument sparked an interest within the analytic branch of western philosophy to concern oneself with second order questions about ethics; specifically the semantics, epistemology and ontology of ethics. [tags: Ethics]
. 25 Works Cited

1236 words
(3.5 pages)

The Benefits of Eating Horse Meat Essay examples - They Eat Horses, Don't They. Many Americans have a hard time thinking about eating horse meat. Every year, many horses are slaughtered for meat which is exported to other countries. “The U.S. Humane Society Web site says 55,776 horses were slaughtered last year in the United States and thousands more transported to Canada and Mexico for slaughter there (Lum). By getting rid of unwanted horses, the horse market will begin to steadily climb. Slaughtering horses allows breeders a way to benefit from old horses and benefits the economy. [tags: food, horse meat]
. 5 Works Cited

2597 words
(7.4 pages)

Marketing and Consumer Ethics of the Sainsbury Company Essay - Procedure The author, in order to complete the report studied several texts with regards to marketing and consumer ethics. The author also researched many useful websites with regards to Sainsbury's. The information studied can be found in the bibliography section found at the closing part the report. According to Jobber et al (1998) the marketing mix is ` the tactical `toolkit' of product, place/distribution, promotion and price that an organisation can control in order to facilitate satisfying exchange'. [tags: Marketing]

1244 words
(3.6 pages)

Essay about Argument Against Eating Meat - Argument Against Eating Meat Many people don’t believe think anything of what they eat or how it got there. But the harsh truth is the meat that you eat was once a living, breathing creature that had feeling and emotions. Maybe next time you order a steak or chicken nuggets you should think about the animals that went through extreme pain and conditions for you to eat. Not only is it inhumane to put animals through such pain, not eating meat and having a vegetarian lifestyle can have huge benefits to animals, the environment, and your health. [tags: Vegetarianism, Persuasive, Argumentative]

436 words
(1.2 pages)

Rights and Ethics: What We Need Essay - Many countries around the world agree on two basic rights, the right to liberty and the right to ones own life. Outside of these most basic human and civil rights, what do we deserve, and do these rights apply to animals as well. Human rights worldwide need to be increased and an effort made to improve lives. We must also acknowledge that “just as one wants happiness and fears pain, just as one wants to live and not die, so do other creatures” (Dalai Lama). Animals are just as capable of suffering as we are, and an effort should be made to increase their rights. [tags: human rights, civil rights]
. 3 Works Cited

1140 words
(3.3 pages)

Essay about What's Behind The Curtain? - Throughout history, there have been problems in society where most of society is totally oblivious to. However, these problems have caught the awareness of a few people who have an understanding of what is really occurring behind the curtain. In the book The Jungle, Upton Sinclair reveals the issue of the immoral goals of capitalistic society during the late 1800’s and early 1900’s. Similarly, in the movie Food Inc, the producers of the film reveal the truth about modern capitalism through the use of personal accounts and facts, which all effectively use the rhetorical techniques of imagery, pathos, and logos. [tags: Ethics]

1172 words
(3.3 pages)

The Ethics of Medical Animal Testing Essay - In all matters, including medicine, the well-being of the human race comes before any other consideration. This is the justification for the use of nonhuman animal testing in medicine. Of course this argument brings issues into play that are both ethical and professional and need exploring before a definitive answer can be given. The Rights of “Lesser Life Forms” Animals have rights. This is a statement that very few people will disagree with. Animal cruelty as an end unto itself (i.e. for entertainment) is just wrong. [tags: Ethical Treatment of Animals]
. 15 Works Cited

1938 words
(5.5 pages)

Eating Meat Essay - Eating Meat Eating meat is part of the daily life of billions of people all over the world. Every day thousands of animals are killed for the production of meat food for people. However, studies have shown that meat is not essential for our existence and gives us nothing more than the other foods on the market. Meat consumption may not harm you or the surrounding environment immediately but there are consequences and sooner or later they will appear. A meatless diet is healthier than a diet containing meat. [tags: Papers]

1020 words
(2.9 pages)

Morality Essay - Morality is defined as a system or code that we humans use to differentiate between right and wrong. This system could be derived from a number of factors: religion, culture, and upbringing. It is difficult enough to determine what an individual's morals are, but going further to determine how we came to possess those morals is even more ambitious. Still, regardless of its difficulty, this subject consumes many philosophers and psychologists. One such moral psychologists, Jonathan Haidt, is theorizing the possibility of evolution causing ones morality. [tags: Ethics]

1592 words
(4.5 pages)

Other articles

The Ethics Of Eating Meat Essay

The Ethics Of Eating Meat Essay

The Winner of Our Contest on the Ethics of Eating Meat 03/05/2012 · The Winner of Our Contest on the Ethics of Eating Meat. The Ethicist. The Meat You Eat: Readers Put Their Ethics Where Their Mouths Are. Ethics of eating meat - WikipediaEthics of eating meat agroecologist and winner of The New York Times ' essay contest on the ethics of eating meat. The Ethics of Diet: Overview of the · The Ethics Of Eating Meat Free Essays - StudyModeIs it ethical to eat Meat. 11/29/12 The Ethics of Eating Meat A common controversial topic that is debated in many society’s, especially The Ethics of Eating Meat | Charles EisensteinThe Ethics of Eating Meat. Posted on Jun 28, 2002 Most vegetarians I know are not primarily motivated by nutrition. Although they argue strenuously Is it Ethical to Eat Meat. – Wait But WhyIs it Ethical to Eat Meat. Some protest the poor treatment of animals in the livestock industry but are fine with the actual practice of eating meat. Ethics of Meat Eating - Essay - Essays24.com Social Issues Essays: Ethics of Meat EatingEthics of Meat Eating This essay Ethics of Meat Eating is available for you on Essays24.com!Why Eating Meat is Ethical - NYT Bulletproof EditorialThe New York Times invited readers to tell them why eating meat is ethical. Here is the Bulletproof version that I submitted for consideration.The Ethics of Eating Animals | Sustainability at HarvardThe Ethics of Eating Animals. March 12, 2014. By Hanna Evensen, College '16. Share This. We’ve heard arguments about the environmental disadvantages of eating red meat .The Ethics of Eating Meat - The New York Times15/03/2014 · The Opinion Pages | The Ethics of Eating Meat. Search. Subscribe Now Log In 0 Settings. Close search Site Search Navigation. Search NYTimes.com. Clear …More Essay Results: “Why It’s Unethical to Eat Meat ” by a question of ethics. Photo by Derek Goodwin; Courtesy of Eating meat is correlated with an increased risk for virtually Our Hen House. Inc.is a 501

Ethics of eating meat Essay Example | Topics, Sample

Have you ever wondered why people become vegetarians? People who are vegetarians choose to become so for a wide variety of reasons. Being a vegetarian has become a Why Eating Meat is Ethical - NYT Bulletproof EditorialBulletproof Editorial for the New York Times: Why Eating Meat is Ethical Example Essays. Ethics Of Eating Meat Meat Not eating red meat is a major advantage to the environment. Finally, there are good ethics in non-red meat eaters. By eating red meat. the environment is at a Ethics of Meat Eating - Essay - Essays24.com Social Issues Essays. Ethics of Meat EatingEthics of Meat Eating This essay Ethics of Meat Eating is available for you on Essays24.com!The Ethics of Eating. by Peter Singer - Utilitarian'The Ethics of Eating ', by there is growing concern about the ethics of the way meat and More common is the view that we are justified in eating meat. the ethics of eating meat essay - kind-essay .tkthe ethics of eating meat essay. By not eating meat one can substantially improve their health, the environment and animals. The ethics of eating meat .Essays on Essay On Singer And Mason 's The Ethics Of Eating Free Essays on Essay On Singer And Mason s The Ethics Of Eating Meat. Get help with your writing. 1 through 30Ethics of Eating Meat | The Huffington Post14/05/2012 · Ethics of Eating Meat. This accident of circumstance probably disqualifies me from any serious ethical discussion of meat eating. After all, Free Essays on Ethics Of Eating Meat - Brainia.comFree Essays on Ethics Of Eating Meat. Essay 2 Healthy Eating to Prevent Chronic Illness Proper nutrition starts at an early age and children should More Essay Results: “Why It’s Unethical to Eat Meat ” by Today we continue our essay results with runner-up Britt LoSacco. *** RUNNER-UP. Why It’s Unethical to Eat Meat. by Britt LoSacco. Contrary to what many omnivores

Free Essays on The Ethics Of Eating Meat Singer And Mason through

Essays on The Ethics Of Eating Meat Singer And Mason Search Results
  1. Ethics Of Eating Meat Ethics of Eating Meat." E-mail interview. 9 Oct. 2012. Pollan, Michael. The Ethics of Eating. meat-eating throughout his writing but he strongly agrees with Singer.
  2. Why Is It Ethical To Eat Meat? Why is it ethical to eat meat? The answer is ridiculously simple: Because we do not live in a vacuum. Man isn't the only creature on the planet that eats meat. From.
  3. Ethics Of Eating Meat of meat is now purely for gustatory pleasure. By eating meat, the consumer is contributing to the slaughter of animal for pleasure opposed to survival. Eating meat.
  4. Animal Rights - Is It Morally Wrong To Eat Meat? to eat meat?" The case for animal rights has been advocated by Peter Singer who maintains. and it is the moral and ethical obligations upon human beings to give.
  5. Eating Meat eat meat and by-products completely and spread this vegan diet to others. In conclusion, though eating meat. it makes for a better ethical choice, and it can.
  6. Better Off In Meat And Dairy Industry animal farms. In Meat and Milk Factories, a chapter in The Ethics of What We Eat: Why Our Food Choices Matters Singer and Mason say the amount of meat and milk in.
    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
  7. Ethics In Eating eating food. This new way of producing food has some Americans questioning the ethics of eating. Americas poor food ethics. vegetables, and meats to those of the.
  8. Meat-Pros And Cons of all, eating meat has a real damaging effect towards the enviroment.To put in in another way, it is so unethical that in order to eat meat. we kill thousants.
    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
  9. Kant The Philosophy of History Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel With Prefaces by Charles Hegel and the Translator, J. Sibree, M.A. The History of the World is not.
    • 191306 Words
    • 766 Pages
  10. Mcgraw Sat Help McGRAW-HILLs SAT This page intentionally left blank McGRAW-HILLs SAT 2010 EDITION CHRISTOPHER BLACK MARK ANESTIS and the TUTORS of COLLEGE.
    • 316492 Words
    • 1266 Pages
  11. Vegetarism ethical orientation. When thinking of a vegetarian, one does not envision a person just like everyone else except that he or she does not eat meat.
    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
  12. Animal Rights meat-eating, as well as the denial that meat. Singer published his book, Animal Liberations. Singer. is humane, painless, and ethical? Whats the difference between.
    • 3252 Words
    • 14 Pages
  13. Why You Shouldn't Eat Meat Eat Meat Hancock 1 Haley Hancock 11/22/11 J. Adu English 1010 Why You Shouldn't Eat Meat. Marcus, Erik. Meat market: animals, ethics, & money. Boston.
  14. Vegetarianism environmental cataclysm are used to advance an ethical agenda. However, arguments to the effect that eating meat is "destroying the planet" overlook that the.
    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
  15. Mad Cowboy meat is a main factor to ones energy, protein and micronutrient intake for older people. As one can see a person can eat meat. for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
    • 2485 Words
    • 10 Pages
  16. Animal Rights In The Media Gifford, www.meat.org. Now if you can read that and still eat meat. ethical issues raised by human superiority over animals, why we shouldn’t.
    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
  17. Cannibalism Vs Eating Meat you, is eating meat ethical? If given the option would you eat human flesh if it was socially and morally acceptable? Or would you find something else to eat, like.
  18. English Essays 10 11-. " " (Argumentative essay). 29 (). 10-11.
    • 12644 Words
    • 51 Pages
  19. a Vegan's Travels eating animals, I would lie to state that I am not a vegetarian or vegan. I eat meat and. or ethical reasons. For example, some vegans feel that one promotes the meat.
    • 3530 Words
    • 15 Pages
  20. Decay To be published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (in press) © Cambridge University Press 2009 Below is the unedited, uncorrected final draft of a BBS target.
    • 23720 Words
    • 95 Pages
  21. Animal Rights Or Wrongs meat out of their diet tend to have less chance of heart disease, colon cancer and stroke. Not to mention by not eating meat. PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of.
    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
  22. Environmentally way increase. Keywords Individual responsibility Á Environmental problems Á Ethical consumers Á Forward-looking responsibility Á Institutional responsibility.
    • 8629 Words
    • 35 Pages
  23. Factory Act CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement 2. Definitions SCHEDULE Rules 3 to 11 prescribed under sub-section (1) of Section 6 3. 3-A.
    • 124369 Words
    • 498 Pages
  24. Education Unit - 1 A TRAFFIC NIGHTMARE Summary: The residents and the schools in Beach Road are very much upset with the heavy traffic on the road after the.
    • 17006 Words
    • 69 Pages
  25. To Eat Meat, Or Not To Eat Meat Paper November 23, 2010 To Eat Meat, or Not To Eat Meat Introduction It is estimated that the average American consumes 180 pounds of meat a year. That is double.
  26. About Time To Give Animals Their Rights, Right? those long, jagged canines are for eating. Wolves are carnivores, they eat meat, hence the teeth. What do we expect them to eat, coffee with chocolate chip cookies.
    • 2220 Words
    • 9 Pages
  27. Fitzgerald's Accuracy In His Portrayal Of The Twenties Tom hides in a nearby cave where his mother leaves him food. The family is comfortable for a time, earning enough to eat meat da.
    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
  28. Why Eating Meat Is Unethical eat meat affirm a truth that many others find fanatical: that eating meat is wrong. justified by an extraordinarily profound ethical defense. I really cant live.
  29. The Edible Woman or to be eaten, is that the feminine question? The human mouth is made for eating, talking and kissing, is it not? In the novel "The Edible Woman", written by the.
    • 2462 Words
    • 10 Pages
  30. Humans & Chimpanzees after them until he/ she stands on his or her feet. They eat not only fruit and vegetables but eat meat also. Secondly, due the fact that both of them are really.
    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

Copyright © 2017. EssayDepot.com

Ethics of Eating Meat

Ethics of Eating Meat

I kill animals for a living.

I do it so others, as well as myself, can eat them. This accident of circumstance probably disqualifies me from any serious ethical discussion of meat eating. After all, I can hardly claim objectivity. Then again, who can? I live very close to the forces of nature that give (and take) life and therefore have an informed, if undoubtedly nearsighted, sense of what it is I do.

But is it ethical?

Asking whether eating meat is "ethical" is like asking whether having sex is ethical. Biological imperatives do not pander to such arbitrary distinctions.

My meat-eating is ethical, in the sense that it is not gratuitous; I understand intimately the implications and contradictions of my consumption. I know how it is that my beeves are born, the grasses they like and the ones they don't. I've saved the lives of calves and butchered their mothers in the same afternoon. I thank each for the age-old sacrifice of prey to predator and I swear they understand. I neither rejoice in the blood nor shy from it. This is life. This is ethics.

For me, my proximate, deliberate understanding of what I do defines ethical behavior as a whole: the social moderation of otherwise unrestrained individual yearnings. In my mind, eating #906 (a red mottle-face cow with upturned horns currently braising in the slow cooker) is an ethically different activity than eating a Big Mac on the run.

The fact that I feel comfortable making such a distinction indicates something fundamental about ethics: they evolve. Our current handwringing over what we eat is clearly a privilege born of abundance. Room for such ruminations are only created after the belly hasn't room for anything else. We agonize over meat consumption because we can afford to. Lucky us.

"Ethics" exist as social shorthand; a distilled collective conscience that varies with the social reality it reflects. Ethics do not stand like clean-cut traffic cops in the path of natural urges; they are more like cautionary rumble-strips as we careen down lives strewn with choices. Ethical consumption of meat, therefore, is based upon timing, circumstance, and conscientious understanding of what society deems appropriate. In modern Western culture at least, you are "unethical" if you cannot moderate a biological sexual urge. It is likewise "unethical" to fulfill biological carnivorous urges upon, say, kittens.

We have evolved from a society in which nearly everyone knew the intimate realities and consequences of eating meat to one in which nearly no one does. We have commercially outsourced the twinge of guilt, the pang of discomfort, the heart-race of witnessing a death to just a handful among us. Is there an ethical distinction between the deaths caused by a yeoman farmer who grimly butchers a hog in the fall and a minimum-wage factory worker who mechanically butchers six thousand in a morning? Many of us now see an ethical nuance. Our physical capacities to produce and consume have altered dramatically in the last sixty years; our ethical capacity to accept these realities are altering as well.

My occupation, as a result, caters to omnivores and more than a few "recovering vegetarians" who prefer (apparently) the conscientious killing I practice. I therefore raise my cattle with sentiment but cannot stray into the realm of sentimentality. I recognize that life rests upon the consumption of the unwilling. I obey this ecological truth while simultaneously working within the artificial, changeable lines society delineates. This too, is natural.

Eating meat, particularly #906, is ethical because most people think it is. That is, perhaps, about all one can say.

Ethics of eating meat - Gpedia, Your Encyclopedia

Ethics of eating meat

Various types of meat.

In most societies the great majority of people eat meat when they can get it, but increasing controversy and debate has arisen over the ethics of eating animals. The most commonly given ethical objection to meat -eating is that as, for most people living in the developed world, it is not necessary for their survival or health; [1] slaughtering animals solely because people enjoy the taste of meat is argued by some to be wrong and morally unjustifiable. [2] [3]

Ethical vegetarians may also object to the practices underlying the production of meat. or cite their concerns about animal welfare. animal rights. environmental ethics. and religious scruples. In response, some proponents of meat-eating have adduced various scientific, nutritional, cultural, and religious arguments in support of the practice. Some meat-eaters only object to rearing animals in certain ways, such as in factory farms. or killing them with cruelty; others avoid only certain meats, such as veal or foie gras .

Overview of the argument against meat eating

Peter Singer (Princeton University and University of Melbourne professor and pioneer of the animal liberation movement ) has long argued that, if it is possible to survive and be healthy without eating meat, fish, dairy. or eggs. one ought to choose that option instead of causing unnecessary harm to animals. In Animal Liberation . Singer argued that, because non-human animals feel, they should be treated according to utilitarian ethics. Singer's work has since been widely built upon by philosophers, both those who agree [5] and those who do not, [6] and it has been applied by animal rights advocates [7] as well as by ethical vegetarians and vegans .

Ethical vegetarians say that the reasons for not hurting or killing animals are similar to the reasons for not hurting or killing humans. They argue that killing an animal, like killing a human, can only be justified in extreme circumstances; consuming a living creature just for its taste, for convenience, or out of habit is not justifiable. Some ethicists have added that humans, unlike other animals, are morally conscious of their behavior and have a choice; this is why there are laws governing human behavior, and why it is subject to moral standards. [8]

Ethical vegetarian concerns have become more widespread in developed countries, particularly because of the spread of factory farming, more open and graphic documentation of what human meat-eating entails for the animal, [9] and environmental consciousness. Some proponents of meat-eating argue that the current mass demand for meat has to be satisfied with a mass-production system, regardless of the welfare of animals. Less radical proponents argue that practices like well-managed free-range rearing and the consumption of hunted animals, particularly from species whose natural predators have been significantly eliminated, could satisfy the demand for mass-produced meat. [10] Reducing the worldwide massive food waste would also contribute to reduce meat waste and therefore save animals. [11] [12] Indeed, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. about a third of the food for human consumption is wasted globally (around 1.3 billion tons per year). [13]

Some have described unequal treatment of humans and animals as a form of speciesism such as anthropocentrism or human-centeredness. Val Plumwood (1993, 1996) has argued that anthropocentrism plays a role in green theory that is analogous to androcentrism in feminist theory and ethnocentrism in anti-racist theory. Plumwood calls human-centredness "anthropocentrism" to emphasize this parallel. By analogy with racism and sexism. Melanie Joy has dubbed meat-eating "carnism ". The animal rights movement seeks an end to the rigid moral and legal distinction drawn between human and non-human animals, an end to the status of animals as property, and an end to their use in the research. food, clothing. and entertainment industries. [14] [15] Peter Singer, in his ethical philosophy of what it is to be a "person". argues that livestock animals feel enough to deserve better treatment than they receive. Many thinkers have questioned the morality not only of the double standard underlying speciesism but also the double standard underlying the fact that people support treatment of cows, pigs, and chickens that they would never allow with pet dogs, cats, or birds. [5]

Jay Bost, agroecologist and winner of The New York Times ' essay contest on the ethics of eating meat, summarized his argument in the following way: "eating meat raised in specific circumstances is ethical; eating meat raised in other circumstances is unethical" in regard to environmental usage. He proposes that if "ethical is defined as living in the most ecologically benign way, then in fairly specific circumstances, of which each eater must educate himself, eating meat is ethical." The specific circumstances he mentions include using animals to cycle nutrients and convert sun to food. [16] Ethicists like Tom Regan and Peter Singer define "ethical" in terms of suffering rather than ecology. Mark Rowlands argues that the real determinant of whether it is ethical to cause suffering is whether there is any vital need to cause it; if not, then causing it is unethical. [5]

Shorthorn heifers, a typical multipurpose breed of cattle.

Ethologist Jane Goodall stated in the 2009 book The Inner World of Farm Animals that "farm animals feel pleasure and sadness, excitement and resentment, depression, fear and pain. They are much more sensitive and intelligent than we ever imagined." [17] In 2012, a group of well known neuroscientists [18] stated in the "Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness in Non-Human Animals" that all mammals and birds (such as farm animals), and other animals, possess the neurological substrates that generate consciousness and are able to experience affective states. [19] Eugene Linden. author of The Parrot's Lament. suggests that many examples of animal behavior and intelligence seem to indicate both emotion and a level of consciousness that we would normally ascribe only to our own species.

Consciousness requires a certain kind of informational organization that does not seem to be "hard-wired" in humans, but is instilled by human culture. Moreover, consciousness is not a black-or-white, all-or-nothing type of phenomenon, as is often assumed. The differences between humans and other species are so great that speculations about animal consciousness seem ungrounded. Many authors simply assume that an animal like a bat has a point of view, but there seems to be little interest in exploring the details involved. [20]

A related argument revolves around non-human organisms' ability to feel pain. If animals could be shown to suffer, as humans do, then many of the arguments against human suffering could be extended to animals. [21] One such reaction is transmarginal inhibition. a phenomenon observed in humans and some animals akin to mental breakdown .

People have assumed that intelligence is linked to the ability to suffer and that because animals have smaller brains they suffer less than humans. That is a pathetic piece of logic, sentient animals have the capacity to experience pleasure and are motivated to seek it, you only have to watch how cows and lambs both seek and enjoy pleasure when they lie with their heads raised to the sun on a perfect English summer's day. Just like humans. [22]

Influences on views of animal consciousness

When people choose to do things about which they are ambivalent and which they would have difficulty justifying, they experience a state of cognitive dissonance. which can lead to rationalization. denial. or even self-deception. For example, a 2011 experiment found that, when the harm that their meat-eating causes animals is explicitly brought to people's attention, they tend to rate those animals as possessing fewer mental capacities compared to when the harm is not brought to their attention. This is especially evident when people expect to eat meat in the near future. Such denial makes it less uncomfortable for people to eat animals. The data suggest that people who consume meat go to great lengths to try to resolve these moral inconsistencies between their beliefs and behaviour by adjusting their beliefs about what animals are capable of feeling. [23] Ethical vegetarians argue that it is behaviour rather than supporting beliefs that should be adjusted.

Some people choose to be vegetarian or vegan for environmental reasons.

According to a 2006 report by LEAD Livestock's Long Shadow . "the livestock sector emerges as one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global." [24] The livestock sector is probably the largest source of water pollution (due to animal wastes, fertilizers, and pesticides), contributing to eutrophication. human health problems, and the emergence of antibiotic resistance. It accounts also for over 8% of global human water use.

Livestock production is by far the biggest cause of land use, as it accounts for 30% of the global land surface. It is probably the leading player in biodiversity loss, as it causes deforestation. land degradation. pollution, climate change. overfishing, and invasions by alien species. [24] Livestock is also responsible for at least 20% of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, which are the main cause of the current climate change. This is due to feed production, enteric fermentation from ruminants, manure storage and processing, and transportation of animal products. [25] The greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production greatly exceeds the greenhouse gas emissions of any other human activity. Some authors argue that by far the best thing we can do to slow climate change is a global shift towards a vegetarian or vegan diet. [26]

The use of large industrial monoculture that is common in industrialized agriculture, typically for feed crops such as corn and soy. is more damaging to ecosystems than more sustainable farming practices such as organic farming. permaculture. arable. pastoral. and rain-fed agriculture. Other concerns include the wasting of natural resources, such as food and water.

Animals that feed on grain or rely on grazing require more water than grain crops. [27] Produce 1 kg of meat requires up to 15,000 liters of water. [28] According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), growing crops for farm animals requires nearly half of the US water supply and 80% of its agricultural land. Animals raised for food in the US consume 90% of the soy crop, 80% of the corn crop, and 70% of its grain. [29] However, where an extensive farming system (as opposed to a feedlot) is used, some water and nutrients are returned to the soil to provide a benefit to the pasture. This cycling and processing of water and nutrients is less prevalent in most plant production systems, so may bring the efficiency rate of animal production closer to the efficiency of plant based agricultural systems. [30] In tracking food animal production from the feed through to the dinner table, the inefficiencies of meat, milk. and egg production range from a 4:1 energy input to protein output ratio up to 54:1. [31] The result is that producing animal-based food is typically much less efficient than the harvesting of grains, vegetables, legumes. seeds, and fruits.

There are also environmentalist arguments in favor of the morality of eating meat. One such line of argument holds that sentience and individual welfare are less important to morality than the greater ecological good. Following environmentalist Aldo Leopold 's principle that the sole criterion for morality is preserving the "integrity, stability and beauty of the biotic community", this position asserts that sustainable hunting and animal agriculture are environmentally healthy and therefore good. [32] [33]

Religious traditions of eating meat

Hinduism holds vegetarianism as an ideal for three reasons: the principle of nonviolence (ahimsa ) applied to animals; the intention to offer only "pure" (vegetarian) or sattvic food to a deity and then to receive it back as prasad ; and the conviction that an insentient diet is beneficial for a healthy body and mind and that non-vegetarian food is detrimental for the mind and for spiritual development. Buddhist vegetarianism has similar strictures against hurting animals. The actual practices of Hindus and Buddhists vary according to their community and according to regional traditions. Jains are especially rigorous about not harming sentient organisms [ citation needed ] .

Islamic Law and Judaism have dietary guidelines called Halal and Kashrut. respectively. In Judaism, meat that may be consumed according to halakha (Jewish law) is termed kosher ; meat that is not compliant with Jewish law is called treif . Causing unnecessary pain to animals is prohibited by the principle of tza'ar ba'alei chayim. While it is neither required nor prohibited for Jews to eat meat, a number of medieval scholars of Judaism, such as Joseph Albo and Isaac Arama. regard vegetarianism as a moral ideal.

Criticisms and responses

It has been argued that a moral community requires all participants to be able to make moral decisions, but animals are incapable of making moral choices (e.g. a tiger would not refrain from eating a human because it was morally wrong; it would decide whether to attack based on its survival needs, as dictated by hunger). Thus, some opponents of ethical vegetarianism argue that the analogy between killing animals and killing people is misleading. [34] For example, Hsiao (2015) compares the moral severity of harming animals to that of picking a flower or introducing malware into a computer. [34] Humans are capable of culture, innovation, and the sublimation of instinct in order to act in an ethical manner. Animals are not, and so are unequal to humans on a moral level. This does not excuse cruelty, but it implies animals are not morally equivalent to humans and do not possess the rights a human has. [35] The precise definition of a moral community is not simple, but Hsiao defines membership by the ability to know one's own good and that of other members, and to be able to grasp this in the abstract. He claims that non-human animals do not meet this standard. [34]

Benjamin Franklin describes his conversion to vegetarianism in chapter one of his autobiography, but then he describes why he (periodically) ceased vegetarianism in his later life:

in my first voyage from Boston. our people set about catching cod, and hauled up a great many. Hitherto I had stuck to my resolution of not eating animal food. But I had formerly been a great lover of fish, and, when this came hot out of the frying-pan, it smelt admirably well. I balanc'd some time between principle and inclination, till I recollected that, when the fish were opened, I saw smaller fish taken out of their stomachs; then thought I, "If you eat one another, I don't see why we mayn't eat you." So I din'd upon cod very heartily, and continued to eat with other people, returning only now and then occasionally to a vegetable diet. So convenient a thing it is to be a reasonable creature, since it enables one to find or make a reason for everything one has a mind to do. [36]

The response of ethical vegetarians is that humans have a choice, whereas animals do not. Hence, if hurting or killing animals is not necessary for human survival or health (as it is necessary for obligate carnivores. such as felids ), humans can decide to stop doing it, and to outlaw it. [ citation needed ]

One study found that approximately 60% of contemporary professional ethicists consider it "morally bad" to eat meat from mammals. [37]

Animal welfare

Various programs operate in the US that promote the notion that animals raised for food can be treated humanely. Some spokespeople for the factory farming industry argue that the animals are better off in total confinement. For example, according to F J "Sonny" Faison, president of Carroll's Foods:

They're in state-of-the-art confinement facilities. The conditions that we keep these animals in are much more humane than when they were out in the field. Today they're in housing that is environmentally controlled in many respects. And the feed is right there for them all the time, and water, fresh water. They're looked after in some of the best conditions, because the healthier and [more] content that animal, the better it grows. So we're very interested in their well-being up to an extent. [38]

In response, animal welfare advocates ask for evidence that any factory-bred animal is better off caged than free. [39] Farm Sanctuary argue that commodifying and slaughtering animals is incompatible with the definition of "humane". [40] Animal ethicists such as Gary Francione have argued that reducing animal suffering is not enough; it needs to be made illegal and abolished .

Non-chordates

Peter Singer [41] has pointed out that the ethical argument for vegetarianism may not apply to all non-vegetarian food. For example, any arguments against causing pain to animals would not apply to animals that do not feel pain. It has also often been noted that, while it takes a lot more grain to feed some animals such as cows for human consumption than it takes to feed a human directly, not all animals consume land plants (or other animals that consume land plants). For example, oysters consume underwater plankton and algae. In 2010, Christopher Cox wrote:

Biologically, oysters are not in the plant kingdom, but when it comes to ethical eating, they are almost indistinguishable from plants. Oyster farms account for 95 percent of all oyster consumption and have a minimal negative impact on their ecosystems; there are even nonprofit projects devoted to cultivating oysters as a way to improve water quality. Since so many oysters are farmed, there's little danger of overfishing. No forests are cleared for oysters, no fertilizer is needed, and no grain goes to waste to feed them—they have a diet of plankton, which is about as close to the bottom of the food chain as you can get. Oyster cultivation also avoids many of the negative side effects of plant agriculture: There are no bees needed to pollinate oysters, no pesticides required to kill off other insects, and for the most part, oyster farms operate without the collateral damage of accidentally killing other animals during harvesting. [42]

Cox went on to suggest that oysters would be acceptable to eat, even by strict ethical criteria, if they did not feel: "while you could give them the benefit of the doubt, you could also say that unless some new evidence of a capacity for pain emerges, the doubt is so slight that there is no good reason for avoiding eating sustainably produced oysters." Cox has added that, although he believes in some of the ethical reasons for vegetarianism, he is not strictly a vegan or even a vegetarian because he consumes oysters.

Animal and plant pain

Critics of ethical vegetarianism say that there is no agreement on where to draw the line between organisms that can and cannot feel. Justin Leiber, a philosophy professor at Oxford University. writes that:

Montaigne is ecumenical in this respect, claiming consciousness for spiders and ants, and even writing of our duties to trees and plants. Singer and Clarke agree in denying consciousness to sponges. Singer locates the distinction somewhere between the shrimp and the oyster. He, with rather considerable convenience for one who is thundering hard accusations at others, slides by the case of insects and spiders and bacteria, they pace Montaigne, apparently and rather conveniently do not feel pain. The intrepid Midgley, on the other hand, seems willing to speculate about the subjective experience of tapeworms. Nagel. appears to draw the line at flounders and wasps, though more recently he speaks of the inner life of cockroaches. [43]

There are also some who argue that, although only suffering animals feel anguish, plants, like all organisms, have evolved mechanisms for survival. No living organism can be described as "wanting" to die for another organism's sustenance. [44] In an article written for The New York Times. Carol Kaesuk Yoon argues that:

When a plant is wounded, its body immediately kicks into protection mode. It releases a bouquet of volatile chemicals, which in some cases have been shown to induce neighboring plants to pre-emptively step up their own chemical defenses and in other cases to lure in predators of the beasts that may be causing the damage to the plants. Inside the plant, repair systems are engaged and defenses are mounted, the molecular details of which scientists are still working out, but which involve signaling molecules coursing through the body to rally the cellular troops, even the enlisting of the genome itself, which begins churning out defense-related proteins. If you think about it, though, why would we expect any organism to lie down and die for our dinner? Organisms have evolved to do everything in their power to avoid being extinguished. How long would any lineage be likely to last if its members effectively didn't care if you killed them? [45]

Animals killed in crop harvesting

Steven Davis, a professor of animal science at Oregon State University. argues that the least harm principle does not require giving up all meat. Davis states that a diet containing beef from grass-fed ruminants such as cattle would kill fewer animals than a vegetarian diet, particularly when one takes into account animals killed by agriculture. [46]

This conclusion has been criticized by Jason Gaverick Matheny (founder of in vitro meat organization New Harvest ) because it calculates the number of animals killed per acre (instead of per consumer). Matheny says that, when the numbers are adjusted, Davis' argument shows veganism as perpetrating the least harm. [47] Davis' argument has also been criticized by Andy Lamey for being based on only two studies that may not represent commercial agricultural practices. When differentiating between animals killed by farm machinery and those killed by other animals, he says that the studies again show veganism to do the "least harm". [48]

One of the main differences between a vegan and a typical vegetarian diet is the avoidance of both eggs and dairy products such as milk, cheese, butter, and yogurt. Ethical vegans do not consume dairy or eggs because they believe their production causes animal suffering or premature death. [49]

To produce milk from dairy cattle. most calves are separated from their mothers soon after birth and fed milk replacement in order to retain the cows' milk for human consumption. [50] Animal welfare advocates point out that this breaks the natural bond between the mother and her calf. [50] Unwanted male calves are either slaughtered at birth or sent for veal production. [50] To prolong lactation. dairy cows are almost permanently kept pregnant through artificial insemination. [50] Although cows' natural life expectancy is about twenty years, [49] after about five years the cows' milk production has dropped; they are then considered "spent" and are sent to slaughter for meat and leather. [51] [52]

Battery cages are the predominant form of housing for laying hens worldwide; these cages reduce aggression and cannibalism among hens. but are barren, restrict movement, and increase rates of osteoporosis. [53] [54] [55] In these systems and in free-range egg production, unwanted male chicks are culled and killed at birth during the process of securing a further generation of egg-laying hens. [56] It is estimated that an average consumer of eggs who eats 200 eggs per year for 70 years of his or her life is responsible for the deaths of 140 birds, and that an average consumer of milk who drinks 190 kg per year for 70 years is responsible for the deaths of 2.5 cows. [57]