Essay for you

Science And Ethics Gp Essay Topics

Rating: 4.4/5.0 (44 Votes)

Category: Essay


MNSES9100 - Science, ethics and society - University of Oslo

MNSES9100 - Science, ethics and society Course content

The course takes a critical and analytical look at the role of science and technology in modern society. Questions addressed include: What is science? How does it differ from other disciplines? Which ethical responsibilities do scientists have to their peers and the public? How should society manage technological risk? What is the role of education, the media, industry and government on the progress of science and technology?

The course covers three main topics:

  • philosophy of science;
  • research ethics; and
  • science and society. Examples and case studies will be taken from all areas of science and technology.
Learning outcome

The course will contribute to the student's appreciation of the place and role of science in a modern society, as well as a broad insight into the way science and scientists are perceived and studied within other disciplines such as philosophy, ethics and sociology. Course literature ranges from classic works in philosophy of science and research ethics, to topical cases drawn from the international and national media. The analysis and discussion of case studies forms a central part of the course, particularly in research ethics. Teaching comprises both lectures and small group discussions.

PhD candidates from the University of Oslo should apply for classes and register for examinations through Studentweb .

MNSES9100 has limited intake capacity, and priority will be given to PhD candidates at the University of Oslo.

PhD candidates who have been admitted to another higher education institution must apply for a position as a visiting PhD student within a given deadline and will be informed about registration 3 weeks prior to the course's start.

Prerequisites Formal prerequisite knowledge

No obligatory prerequisites beyond the minimum requirements for entrance to higher education in Norway.

Overlapping courses
  • 5 credits with MNVIT9000
  • 5 credits with MNVIT8000
  • 6 credits with MNVIT401

Teaching runs as an intensive course over 1-2 weeks with 20 hours of lectures and 12 hours of group discussions and seminars. 2-3 weeks after the course there will be a follow-up seminar for students to present, discuss and get feedback on their chosen essay topics.

NB! You have to participate in at least 80 % of the teaching to be allowed to take the exam. Attendance at lectures will be registered.


A written essay of 6-9 pages.

Examination support material

No examination support material is allowed.

Grading scale

Grades are awarded on a pass/fail scale. Read more about the grading system .

Other articles

Ethics Unit 2 GP Essay by

Ethics Unit 2 GP

Environmental Policy Statement

Pg .1 The United Parcel Service (UPS ) helps to secure. improve

and protect the environment and the safety of our employees

communities and customers. We help to secure the health of birds and

the environment by helping to create a safer. cleaner world for

everyone on this Earth. We are a business with more than 14 ,000 staff who are dedicated to the 188 nature reserves. We have 10 regional

offices all with only one vision to help keep the environment that is

rich in wildlife

to achieve this safer. cleaner vision our business

campaigns to help restore and manage habitats for birds and other

wildlife as well as research the problems that face the environment

The research our business utilizes helps us to understand the problems

and find practical solutions in solving them. Once they are solved we

then help to implement these solutions and promote them to others. We

help to manage nature reserves in for wildlife to flourish so

that people can enjoy them in the future. Our business also helps

people to share the knowledge and promote enthusiasm for the

We recognize that sharing this positive knowledge of the

environment benefits our work. With this in mind. we are very dedicated

in continuing the improvement of our environmental performance and

meeting our collective environmental responsibility. Our environmental

impact comes from. Greenhouse gas releases from energy use and travel

waste and water use. and the use of renewed resources. In to

minimize this impact on the environment we have helped to set the

following goals Advocate and sustain through our example and to achieve and inspire others Develop as well as implement environmental plans to

minimize the impacts and develop appropriate plans to achieve this

improvement Review our environment performance annually Raise awareness about the environment among our staff

as well as encourage them to practice Teach environmental issue responsibilities in employees job s. and employee training The United Parcel (UPS ) justifies the policy above for the

responsibility that lies with the management and the staff. The policy

and support of the management system will be subject to review -Works Cited-

Bhlem. Kenneth. PhD CIH Department of Environmental Health. Colorado

State University. Bastek. Neal Master 's Candidate English Department

Colorado State University HYPERLINK "http /writing .colostate .edu /index .cfm http /writing .colostate .edu /index .cfm.

Not the Essay You're looking for? Get a custom essay ( only for $12.99 )

Bioethics modern science and ethics Essay - 2318 Words

Bioethics: modern science and ethics

Science defines human life as a characteristic that exhibit a process with organization, growth, adaptation, etc.; however, ancient sages told people human life is extremely valuable and sacred, as a religious doctrine in the Ten Commandments: “Thou shalt not kill.” Moreover, when people talk about ethics, they will think about rules to differentiate right and wrong. It might be wise maxims of Confucius or religious beliefs. The most general way to define “ethics” is that “moral principles that govern a person's or group's behavior” (American English in Oxford Dictionary). Bioethics is a pretty young interdisciplinary study, which is considered with ethical questions related to the relationships among human beings, animals, and environments in the late twentieth century. Based on this, bioethics derived three main subdisciplines, which are medical ethics, animal ethics, and environmental ethics. Although each sub-discipline has particular study area in bioethics, there still are overlaps of ethical considerations and approaches. This makes it difficult to easily discuss ethics questions such as stem cell research, xenotransplantation, the ethical status of animals and the ethical status of the environment. Further discussion about the vital issue of moral status solutions is necessary at the same time. In the rapid development of the natural sciences and biotechnology has greatly promoted better living conditions and improve the living standards of people around the world. On another hand, there are opposite consequences, like water and air pollution, nuclear waste, tropical deforestation, as well as large-scale livestock farming, as well as special innovative technologies, such as gene technology and cloning, resulting in doubts and even fears about the future of humanity. Blank legal system, for example, for abortion and euthanasia, many people are very concerned about another one of the reasons. Moreover, ethical issues, from specific conditions and dry, for example, genetic manipulation of food, they produce an intense public debate and serious public safety concerns and issues to consider in the past. As a discipline -specific approach applied ethics and moral reasoning depend largely on the findings in the life sciences, the main problem is that bioethics ethics, animal ethics and environmental ethics. Medical ethics

The history of medical ethics can go back to the beginning of Hippocratic Oath, which is an ancient oath to restrain medical behaviors of physicians possibly in fourth century BC (Edelstein, L. 2000, p. 3). Medical ethics if not only limited to the Oath; after thousands of years’ developments, it has become to a complete system of moral principles that concern the values and judgments to the practice of medicine. As a result, this change has come out advances in medical fields and “affected nearly every aspect of clinical practice, from the confidentiality of patient records to end-of life issues” (Wells, K. R. 2007, p. 1528). For example, as Wells (2007) summarized, Dubler (2000) wrote an article including some topics of what he considered very important in medical ethics and “eHealth” is one on the list. “eHealth”, which means “The expansion of the Internet and other rapid changes in information technology have raised many questions about the confidentiality of electronic medical records as well as the impact of online education on medical training” (Wells, K. R. 2007, p. 1529). According to Clouser (1997), medical ethics has roles. The first one is “a consciousness-raising enterprise, alerting us to everything from grossest injustice to subtlest nuance” (Clouser, K. D. 1997, p. 94). There is a well-known case called “Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California” discussing the need to breach confidentiality in certain circumstances. The California Tarasoff case illustrates the difficulties in protecting patients’ confidentiality. In this case, a graduate student of UC Berkeley.

Please sign up to read full document.


BIOETHICS * Definition of terms: ETHICS Etymological source * Ethics is derived from the Greek word ethicos, which means “custom” or “character.” Vernacular context * Ethics is defined as the philosophical science that deals with the morality of human conduct. * ETHICS * Ethics is a study of good conduct, character, & motives & is concerned with determining what is good or valuable for all people. It goes beyond personal preferences to establish norms & standards upon which individuals, professions & societies agree. * Four Divisions of Ethics 1. Descriptive/ speculative Philosophy * What is the nature or essence or substance of reality? * Ex: Metaphysics (philosophical science of beings) 2. Normative Philosophy * What is good or right and what is bad or wrong action? * Ex: Ethics or Moral Philosophy * Four Divisions of Ethics 3. Practical Philosophy * Reflects on truth with due recourse to action * Ex: Logic 4. Critical Philosophy * What is truth? * Ex: Epistemology (the discipline that deals with knowledge and truth) * * Ethics * Philosophical scienceethics is a normative philosophy. * As a normative.

1103 Words | 5 Pages

HOW TO TELL IF YOUR BUNNY IS SICK AND NEED S TO SEE A VET Bunnies are prey animals and are very good at hiding illness; therefore bunny owners must watch their bunnies closely to identify if the bunny is unwell. This is why bunnies should be inside, so that they are part of the family and you become familiar with their normal temperament and behaviours. Your bunny can also go into shock from heat, noise or fright. If your bunny is unwell, you must take them to a bunny savvy vet immediately. CAUTION: not all vets see enough bunnies to be experienced with bunny health diagnosis and medications. as they are different to cats and dogs. Bunnies need to be treated by a bunny savvy vet who can identify the different co nditions in bunnies. Bunnies must continuously eat for gut mobility. The anatomy of a bunny is mostly gut and if the gut stops working then your bunny could die quickly. WHAT TO LOOK FOR. The most common symptoms that your bunny is unwell include: Not eating. or a dis interest in their favourite foods No droppings or loose droppings Sitting hunched for extended periods Walking dandruff (mites) Any swelling or lumps or wetness around the mouth or eyes Sudden weight loss Some bunnies may also display othe r serious symptoms such as Bloated stomach Head tilt Unable to stand or lethargic or w eakness in legs etc Other conditions such as sneezing. nasal discharge.

845 Words | 6 Pages

Ethics is the difference between what is morally right and wrong. A scientist has to know the ethical consequences of their work. The scientist is responsible. There are many consequences like the harm and amount of risk and benefit in science . There are also ethical procedures involved in science . These procedures include promoting aims of research and knowledge. These procedures help ensure accountability. The big difference is that ethics and laws are not the same. Laws are established rules while ethics is the morals of a culture. Ethics is important because it makes sure that cooperation and joint endeavors run smoothly. One example of ethics in science is stem cell research. Stem Cell Research is when undeveloped cells are molded from adult cells, embryonic cells, and cord cells to finally be created as other cells. Stem Cell research is used as a treatment for such problems as heart disease, diabetes leukemia, and etc. One pro is that adult stem cells are a renewable source of replacement cells and tissues. Researching and using these stem cells may lead to progress and future discoveries in the future. That is the good part, but there are also some cons. These cons mostly got to do with embryonic stem cells. Some stem cells are taken from embryonic stem cells. The problem is that scientists find extraction more important than the misery of destroying a.

1304 Words | 3 Pages

Dr Graeme Watt Aristeidis Koliopoulos Ethics in Science Should scientist have a common ethics code like the oath of Hippocrates for the doctors, or similar to the oath the lawyers give towards society? In order to answer this question it is necessary to examine the meaning of the words Science and Ethics . first independently and then in the context of society. The first step in this process is to define each word. According to Wikipedia “…science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge based on the scientific method, as well as to the organized body of knowledge humans have gained by such research”[1]. Ethics on the other hand “… is the attempt to arrive at general moral standards that tell us [people] how to judge right from wrong, or good from bad, and how to live moral lives”[2]. The above interpretations are, at first glance, not connected to each other. Science is a process, a system, a way to acquire knowledge about the physical world around us. Science . in its pure form, does not have sides, good or bad, positive or negative. Science . one could propose, is the force of understanding. Ethics on the other hand, is a set of criteria, created by man, to define a guideline to his existence. A guideline between what should and what should not occur. Hence the question must be transformed into “Should.

1121 Words | 4 Pages

Science and Ethics When preparing to conduct a scientific experiment or research project, ethics must always be taken into consideration. Any scientist should always strive to conduct ethical experiments and should not move forward with an experiment if there are any ethical concerns. A study can be deemed ethical if the expected cost is less than the supposed benefits. To determine if the benefits outweigh the cost, the researcher must contemplate human and animal discomfort/risks, environmental issues and economic factors. No experiment should be conducted if it cannot be defended against charges of being unethical. Stem cells have the potential to help us understand several human diseases as well as provide treatment for these conditions. That’s due in part to the unique way stem cells operate in comparison to other types of cells. Stem cells are capable of dividing and regenerating for extended periods of time, unlike most other types of cells, and are also unspecialized, which means they don't have a distinctive function. What makes these cells so essential to resolving many incurable ailments, severe physical traumas, degenerative conditions, and genetic diseases is that they can be trained to become specialized in any organ or body part necessary. The controversy surrounding stem cell research was due in part to the research method used prior to 2007, which concentrated on Embryonic Stem Cells. This method involved.

1033 Words | 3 Pages

When determining the status of morality there is three different options. Morality may be the different between objectives, relativistic, or it may be a complex set of rules. Moral nihilists are like relativists by denying ethical objectivism however, relativists believe in moral goodness, duty and virtue and nihilists don’t. Error theorists and expressivism are both forms of moral nihilism. Error theorists believe “our moral judgments are always mistaken”. Expressivists don’t agree and also deny that our moral claims can ever offer an accurate take on reality. (307) Error theory and expressivism are two forms of moral nihilism. Error theorists believe “our moral judgments are always mistaken”. (307) While expressivists deny those beliefs and deny, “that our moral claims can never offer an accurate take on reality”. (307) The error theory is made of three doubts/claims. The first is “there are no moral features in this world”. Error theorists believe that nothing is morally good or bad, or right and wrong. Exemplified in the book many scientific qualities in the world (liquids, being three feet long, carbon based chemicals) but none of them contain moral features. The next doubt of error theorists is no moral judgments are true. There are no moral facts so certain statements made cannot be true. The third corresponds to the second doubt, “our sincere moral judgments try, but always fail, to describe the moral features of things”. Since there are no moral truths for.

1005 Words | 4 Pages

 Ethics Of…. Boxing is a violent sport full of hate where the only objective is to knock your opponent unconscious. This is a very quick and biased view of boxing because if you study boxing closer it helps teach the person about their moral character. Boxing helps teach people to “get off the canvas and roll with the punches” (Marino, 2010, para 8) and to face their fears, two important lessons to get through life. Throughout the article written by Marino, he educates about Aristotelian ethics and uses boxing as a real-life example. I believe that Marino’s invocation of Aristotelian ethics is well articulated, and I agree with his application through boxing relating it to your life. Aristotelian ethics and boxing can relate to the rights and responsibility lens; boxing can help develop our moral lives and can clearly define and educate people about Aristotle’s definition of courage. The sport of boxing and comparing it to real-life morals and virtues is extremely well done by Gordon Marino using Aristotelian ethics . The moral virtues that Aristotle preached such as “qualities, temperance, justice, pride, and truthfulness” (Marino, 2010, para. 11) all can be directly applied to Kantian ethics and the rights/responsibility lens (DesJardins, 2012). Boxing is a man versus man, woman versus woman sport which “can compel a person to take a quick self-inventory.

848 Words | 3 Pages

4-2 Report on how the business could improve the ethics of their operations whilst meeting objectives and ensuring good employer / employee relationship 6 4-3 Design a suitable ethical code 7 Conclusion 8 References 9 Acknowledgement This report is about the ethical approaches and practices are adopted by the business firm. It is very beneficial for the company, because it is increase the goodwill and improves the efficacy of the workers. The main aims of adopting the ethical activities to enhance or promote the goodwill of their business. In this report we will discuss the different ethical approaches and ethics activities are adopted the mostly public firms and many small scale business have embraced ethics as a guide to their operations. Employee empowerment helps to create innovation, and employee have a stake with the company and providing the more beneficial ideas and problem solving solution when the obstacles are arises. The main objective of policy is not to be build or create but convince the employee that is better and it is a better way for or solution the problems. Different approaches which are most ethical path and realize to evaluate the different situation in using the different criteria. Constant learn about ethics and apply to real world business decisions Introduction Ethical activities and practices that are adopting by the companies and it are mandatory by the government to follow these.

1886 Words | 9 Pages

Insights from the 2012 A level General Paper essay questions

Insights from the 2012 A level General Paper essay questions

These were the essay questions from the most recent (2012) A level GP exam here in Singapore.

  1. Is there any value in preserving minority languages in the world?
  2. ‘People in the Arts, living or dead, receive far more recognition than those in the Sciences, even though it is less deserved.’ Consider this claim.
  3. Should people be allowed to have children by artificial means?
  4. To what extent are the rights of animals protected in your society?
  5. The most influential individuals in history are those who have caused the most harm.’ How far would you accept this view?
  6. Is violence ever justified?
  7. Consider the view that mathematics possesses not only truth, but supreme beauty.
  8. In your society, how far is equality for all a reality?
  9. Should everyone be expected to donate suitable organs after death?
  10. Can humour ever be serious?
  11. ‘The key criterion for good government is how well the economy is managed.’ Is this a fair assessment?
  12. How far is it acceptable for technology to be used only for financial benefit?

Though it is dangerous to go “trend-spotting”, there are things we can learn from each year’s paper. Here are some thoughts on the 2012 questions.

i. Fairness and Ethics

One major global concern in recent years has been “inequality”. Measures of income inequality suggest that the divide between rich and poor has been growing, even in the “developed” world. Anecdotal observations speak of the middle income squeeze, wage stagnation, hollowing out of middle income jobs, and calcification of social classes.

Inevitably, we are influenced by the world we live in, and this probably goes for the people who set the questions too. I think concerns over equality, ethics and fairness are quite clearly reflected in this paper. Have a look at the questions and see if you can spot the “equality, ethics and fairness” angle.

By my count, a majority (75%) of the questions are at least partially touched by these sentiments. These are questions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12. Good answers to these questions would certainly include specific domain knowledge (in linguistics, the arts vs sciences debate, and the ethics of organ donations, for example). But they should also consider society’s moral standards and obligations.

ii. The Humanities!

Students often hope that their year’s paper will be “kind”, in that favoured topics will appear. And indeed, a broad range of questions is usually set, with something for everyone.

The official General Paper syllabus, which can be downloaded here. notes that questions can include historical, social, cultural, economic, political, philosophical, and scientific topics, among others, and “will not necessarily be set on every topic area and will not be set in any particular order.”

Still, there are some recurring topic areas. It’s just that these tend to be the ones shunned by a large section of the student body. I’m talking about the “humanities” type questions. These encompass issues related to:

  • Arts vs Sciences (question 2)
  • History (question 5)
  • Role of government (question 11), and even
  • Usefulness and peculiarities of academic subjects (question 7)

Many students would likely roll their eyes and look away, upon reading these questions. They’re certainly neither easy nor popular with the average student.

However, those same students might also have committed time to memorising facts about the environment or instances of media bias, only to find that the relevant essay questions don’t actually show up that often.

So perhaps it’s time to consider reading up a little on humanities issues, if only because they could be suitable (and frequently recurring) backup questions.

iii. Blast from the past: resurgence of philosophical questions

To some observers, the 2012 essay paper had more philosophical questions than those in preceding years. It felt like a GP question list from perhaps ten to fifteen years ago.

Philosophical questions can be difficult to grapple with. They definitely go beyond “literal” interpretations. For a question like number 10 (can humour ever be serious), trying to find examples of “serious jokes” is unlikely to yield a good essay. We might want to think about the less lighthearted purposes of humour, like political caricatures and social protest slogans that use humour to convey serious messages. We should also analyse why there are times when humour can so effectively convey a point.

Questions 2 and 5 can definitely be answered literally, but they would have far more impact if students dwelled on what it means to be “influential”, and how we know if recognition is “deserved”. Neither question holds immediate “correct” answers. They will have to be pondered over the course of the essay.

We will explore philosophical questions in future posts. But for now, a recognition of the sometimes unsaid and barely implied elements in questions can go a long way toward helping a student secure a good grade.

Related posts: